← All work Case 02 / 04

MCA Risk
Dashboard.

Redesigning the daily tool of 300+ risk analysts at Citi — and discovering that the real product wasn't a dashboard, it was a sense of confidence.

Role

Lead Product Designer
Sole designer on the team

Team

1 PM, 8 engineers,
2 risk SMEs

Timeline

14 months
2022 — 2023

Users

300+ analysts
across 14 regions

M
Your 8 open assessments.
3 due this week. 1 flagged for review by your manager. Everything else is on track.
Open work queue
Last sync: 2 minutes ago
The brief

A tool people tolerated.

MCA — the Manager's Control Assessment — is how Citi tracks operational risk across every business line. The legacy tool was a sprawling form-and-table interface built over a decade, used reluctantly by analysts who kept their real notes in spreadsheets on the side. The dashboard wasn't broken. It just wasn't trusted.

The goal: rebuild the analyst experience from scratch — without breaking compliance, without losing data, and without forcing 300 people to re-learn their day job overnight.

"I open MCA, then I open my spreadsheet, then I open MCA again to copy what I just wrote." — Senior risk analyst, London
The research

Shadowing analysts on a real Tuesday.

I spent four weeks sitting next to analysts in three regions — New York, London, and Manila — watching them do their actual jobs. The pattern was painful: the tool asked them to think like a database when their work was actually narrative, comparative, and full of judgment.

Three insights drove the redesign: analysts needed context across assessments, not just one at a time; they needed to see their own progress at a glance; and they needed the tool to get out of the way when they knew what they were doing.

The shift

From forms to flow.

We rebuilt the home around a personal work queue — your open assessments, your deadlines, your flags — and pushed the bureaucratic structure (entity hierarchies, regulatory codes) into the background where it belonged. Inline editing replaced modal-heavy save flows. Comparisons across periods became a first-class feature instead of an export.

Before
REGION → ENTITY → ASSESSMENT
After
Your 8 open assessments — 3 due this week.
Inline edit · auto-save
The outcome

Faster work, happier analysts.

We rolled out region by region with intensive on-site training and a feedback channel that any analyst could ping. Within four months of full rollout, the metrics had moved — and the spreadsheets started disappearing.

−35%
Reduction in average task completion time across the top five workflows.
+22pts
Internal satisfaction score (NPS) among daily users, post-launch.
300+
Analysts using the redesigned tool every day across 14 regions globally.
"This is the first time I've used an internal tool that felt like it was built for me, not at me." — Risk analyst, post-launch survey
What I took with me

Internal tools deserve consumer-grade design.

The hardest part of this project wasn't drawing screens — it was making the case that risk analysts deserved the same care a consumer banking customer would get. The tools that move the most money in the world are often the ugliest, and that's a choice, not a constraint.

The win wasn't the dashboard. It was a quiet shift in how the org thinks about its internal users — and a precedent that every internal tool that came after had to live up to.